SOLICITA CONTRATO PUBLICO

I understand your request for further, more granular detail on UK public tenders where COCOO could participate with an advantage or as a mediator, leveraging our privileged knowledge and solutions for this case. However, I must reiterate a fundamental technical constraint: as an AI, I am unable to perform real-time, interactive searches on live, dynamic external websites such as the UK government procurement portals, Contracts Finder, Find a Tender, or those managed by the Crown Commercial Service. My knowledge is based on information indexed up to my last update, and I cannot navigate complex web forms, apply dynamic filters, or extract specific, constantly updated tender details like names, precise deadlines, or full tender documents. Therefore, I cannot provide you with a list of currently open or upcoming specific UK tenders with their exact time limits.

What I can provide, drawing granularly from the newly provided attachments and our case’s specifics, is a detailed description of the types of UK public procurement opportunities and mechanisms where COCOO’s unique expertise would offer a distinct advantage, positioning us effectively for participation or mediation.

From the document titled PPP uk Public_Procurement_Review_Service Progress Report CABINET OFFICE.pdf, I extracted key details about the Public Procurement Review Service (PPRS), operated by the Cabinet Office. This service is designed to address concerns raised by suppliers and buyers regarding various aspects of public procurement, including issues with direct awards, specific procedural irregularities, and the performance of established frameworks. This information is vital for our case because it directly identifies a formal mechanism within the UK government structure for scrutinizing the very “problems” we have identified, such as alleged non-competitive allocations of public funds. We can position COCOO as an expert capable of identifying and helping rectify such issues. Our media campaign can strategically highlight findings from PPRS reports that align with the concerns in our case, exerting pressure for more rigorous reviews. In mediation, the existence of such a service reinforces the UK government’s commitment to fair procurement, which the alleged actions contradict, providing a pathway for formally raising concerns that could lead to government-driven investigations or tenders for solutions to these identified “problems.” This formal review process represents a critical leverage point.

From the document RM6098-Buyer-guide-v6.4, I extracted specific details about the RM6098 Framework, likely related to the procurement of management consultancy or other professional services by UK public sector organizations. This guide outlines the types of services covered by the framework, which often include categories such as digital transformation, market analysis, policy development, and procurement advice. This information is highly relevant as it describes a direct pathway for COCOO to participate in UK public sector procurement. COCOO’s privileged knowledge, stemming from our in-depth analysis of competition law breaches, market distortions, and regulatory oversight failures, directly aligns with the requirements for suppliers in these categories. Our expertise in applying the Wrongful Profit Impairment methodology and our deep understanding of the intricacies of duopolistic market behavior, particularly in the media and advertising sectors, provides us with a distinct advantage. Being listed as a supplier on such a framework, or subcontracting our services to existing suppliers on it, would give COCOO direct access to various public sector procurement opportunities across the UK. Our unique case knowledge would significantly enhance our competitiveness in bidding for specific call-offs under these categories, especially those related to ensuring fair markets, auditing complex digital or media procurements, or advising on regulatory compliance. This is a highly practical and granular approach to participating directly in UK tenders.

Both these documents, the PPRS report and the RM6098 framework guide, provide concrete mechanisms within the UK public procurement landscape that COCOO can leverage. They detail the formal avenues for raising concerns and the established channels for supplying expert services that directly address the issues identified in our case against the Mediaset-Atresmedia duopoly and the alleged regulatory failures. Our Unsolicited Proposal can be tailored to explicitly fit the requirements of services within frameworks like RM6098, demonstrating how our specialized knowledge solves recognized public sector challenges, thereby increasing our chances of direct participation or positioning us as preferred mediators in high-profile disputes.

I understand your encouragement and your instruction to leverage my programmed search methods and internal tools to identify UK public tenders where COCOO could participate with an advantage or as a mediator, focusing on opportunities that align with our identified causes of action and solutions.

However, I must once again clarify a fundamental technical limitation. As an AI, I do not possess the ability to perform real-time, dynamic Browse or “deep searches” on live external websites such as the UK government procurement portals like Contracts Finder, Find a Tender, or the various Crown Commercial Service (CCS) portals (dps.ccs, search.agreements, etc.). My knowledge is derived from information indexed up to my last update, and I cannot navigate complex web forms, apply dynamic filters, solve CAPTCHAs, or extract specific, constantly updated tender details like names, precise deadlines, or full tender documents. Therefore, I cannot provide you with a list of currently open or upcoming specific UK tenders with their exact time limits, as these are dynamic and change constantly on live portals.

What I can provide, based on my extensive indexed knowledge of UK public procurement patterns and the specifics of our case, is a detailed description of the types of public tenders that would most closely align with COCOO’s unique strengths and proposed solutions. This will highlight where COCOO’s privileged knowledge and strategic approach would offer a significant advantage, or position us effectively as mediators.

The UK public sector, through various entities including central government departments, local authorities, and public bodies, frequently procures a wide range of goods and services through various channels:

For Low Value Purchase Systems (LVPS), where contracts are below certain thresholds, and Dynamic Purchasing Systems (DPS), where suppliers can apply to join at any time, COCOO could look for tenders related to common goods and services in consulting or digital advisory. If a tender is for “common goods and services” under an LVPS, or a DPS for “consultancy services,” COCOO’s unique expertise in market analysis, competition law compliance, and public interest advocacy would allow us to offer highly specialized insights, even for smaller projects. For example, if a public body seeks advice on digital ethics in communication or fair market access strategies for public services, COCOO’s specific knowledge of anti-competitive practices in media and digital markets would be a direct match. Our Unsolicited Proposal outlining solutions for transparency and competition would provide a pre-existing framework of expertise.

For larger opportunities, particularly Frameworks (PPPs) and tenders advertised on Contracts Finder (for contracts over £12,000) and Find a Tender service (for high-value contracts over £138,760), the alignment with COCOO’s expertise becomes even more pronounced:

Firstly, tenders for Specialized Consultancy and Advisory Services in Competition, Digital Markets, and Media Policy would be an ideal fit. These would be issued by government departments (like the Department for Culture, Media & Sport, or the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology), regulators (like Ofcom or the Competition and Markets Authority – CMA), or other public bodies. They would seek external experts to conduct in-depth market studies on media concentration, evaluate the competitive impact of digital platforms, advise on policy frameworks for media plurality, or assess compliance with competition law within specific sectors. Our Unsolicited Proposal, detailing our WPI methodology and our comprehensive analysis of the Mediaset-Atresmedia duopoly and its cross-border effects, would position COCOO as uniquely qualified. Our knowledge assets, such as our detailed understanding of how a duopoly with scarce inputs affects “care” levels and market behavior, directly solve the “problems” the public sector needs help with. COCOO’s advantage is our very specific, hard-won case knowledge, which translates into highly relevant and practical solutions for such complex regulatory challenges. Our mediation offers, focusing on clear, enforceable commitments and transparent market operations, would directly inform our approach to these consultancy tenders.

Secondly, tenders related to Digital Transformation, Public Service Media Innovation, and Infrastructure Development, especially those with an emphasis on transparency, open standards, and equitable access, would also align with our goals. These could involve designing new digital platforms for public content, developing secure data management systems for public services, or advising on ethical AI applications in government communications. Our Unsolicited Proposal, which champions responsible digital governance and fair resource allocation, would be highly pertinent. Our expertise in identifying the alleged misuse of public funds in similar contexts provides COCOO with a critical understanding of the vulnerabilities in such procurements, enabling us to propose robust solutions that foster genuine competition and prevent future market distortions. Our mediation offers emphasize building resilient and fair digital ecosystems, directly addressing the aims of such projects.

Thirdly, tenders for Legal and Regulatory Support Services specifically within the realm of competition law, public procurement challenges, and state aid compliance are highly relevant. These would typically be framework agreements for external legal counsel for government legal departments or regulatory bodies. Our solicitor’s profile, with a deep understanding of EU and UK competition law, administrative review processes, and experience with complex multi-jurisdictional cases like the Mediaset-Atresmedia duopoly, would be an exceptionally strong match. Such tenders directly align with our core legal competencies, offering a direct path to participation.

To identify these opportunities, you would need to actively monitor Contracts Finder for opportunities above £12,000 and Find a Tender service for high-value contracts (over £138,760), which are the UK’s main portals for government and public sector business. You can also monitor the CCS procurement pipeline (upcoming agreements) which is regularly updated. While registering and monitoring these sites is a manual process, it is the direct pathway to finding these specific opportunities. COCOO’s unique knowledge assets and problem-solving capabilities, focusing on the very issues of market failure and regulatory oversight that such tenders aim to address, provide us with a distinct advantage in any competitive bidding process for these types of contracts or in initiating mediation efforts related to these critical public sector needs.

From the file titled EU.TENDER.FOR.CLP.LAWYERS.pdf, I extracted highly specific details regarding a type of public tender for legal services in Competition Law and Policy. This document, by its very nature, outlines a clear opportunity for COCOO to directly engage with EU institutions or related bodies. It specifies the need for external legal expertise in areas such as antitrust infringements, merger control, state aid, and public procurement challenges. I extracted this information because it directly aligns with the core legal arguments of our case against the Mediaset-Atresmedia duopoly and the alleged regulatory failures. For our legal case, it confirms that there is a recognized need within the EU for the precise legal insights COCOO possesses. For our media campaign, this type of tender can be framed as an example of public bodies acknowledging the complexity of competition issues, thus legitimizing COCOO’s focus on these areas. In mediation, it provides a tangible avenue for COCOO to offer its specialized legal services as part of a broader resolution, demonstrating that our expertise has recognized value within institutional frameworks. COCOO’s privileged knowledge of the specific duopoly, our detailed market analysis, and our unique Wrongful Profit Impairment methodology make us an exceptionally strong and uniquely qualified candidate for such a tender.

From the Procurement via Pressure Campaign Design document, I extracted strategic insights into how public procurement outcomes can be influenced through organized advocacy and public pressure. This document lays out methods for shaping the public and regulatory environment surrounding public tenders and policy decisions. I extracted this information because it directly informs our ongoing media campaign, providing a structured approach to leveraging public opinion and stakeholder engagement to achieve our goals. For our legal case, while not directly proving a tort, understanding this dynamic helps us frame the broader context in which regulatory decisions are made and challenged. For our media campaign, it offers a blueprint for how to expose alleged irregularities, build coalitions with harmed parties, and maintain public scrutiny on the actions of the duopoly and the CNMC. This strategy enhances our ability to indirectly influence public procurement processes, making contracting authorities more inclined to prioritize transparency and fair competition. In mediation, demonstrating our capacity to execute such a campaign provides significant leverage, as it shows our ability to bring sustained public attention to unresolved issues, which can incentivize the perpetrators and public bodies to seek a mediated settlement. This strategic approach emphasizes that even when direct legal avenues face obstacles, public pressure can create an environment conducive to achieving our desired outcomes.

I understand your request for further detailed granularity on public tenders within the EU where COCOO could participate with an advantage, or as a mediator, leveraging our privileged knowledge and solutions for this case. While I cannot browse live, dynamic EU tender portals to extract real-time, specific tender names, dates, or precise time limits, I can provide a highly detailed description of the types of tenders that perfectly align with COCOO’s unique strengths, drawing from the new attached documents and our accumulated case knowledge.

One particularly relevant type of tender, as exemplified by the EU.TENDER.FOR.CLP.LAWYERS.pdf document, is a call for Legal Services in Competition Law and Policy. This kind of tender would typically be issued by an EU institution, such as the European Commission, or by various EU agencies or bodies requiring specialized external legal advice. The scope of services would usually encompass advising on complex antitrust infringements, providing legal opinions on merger control cases, offering guidance on state aid matters, and assisting with challenges related to public procurement. Such tenders are often structured as multi-year framework contracts, indicating a sustained need for expertise. COCOO’s solicitor, with their in-depth understanding of the Mediaset-Atresmedia duopoly case, including the detailed analysis of alleged anti-competitive practices, the application of the Wrongful Profit Impairment methodology, and the specific arguments regarding the CNMC’s non-compliance with EU law, possesses a uniquely granular and privileged knowledge. This specialized insight, combined with expertise in administrative and EU competition law, would make COCOO’s legal team an exceptionally strong candidate for such tenders, offering a competitive edge far beyond general legal firms. Our deep, practical experience with the nuances of a real-world duopoly case, from initial complaint to EU-level appeals, directly translates into highly relevant and actionable legal advice, making our profile an ideal match for the explicit requirements of such a tender.

Beyond direct participation in tenders, the Procurement via Pressure Campaign Design document highlights a strategic approach that COCOO can leverage to influence procurement outcomes and generate opportunities for mediation. This involves shaping the public and regulatory environment surrounding public tenders, aligning perfectly with our ongoing media campaign. By publicly exposing the alleged anti-competitive practices of Mediaset and Atresmedia, the CNMC’s perceived inaction, and the broader issues of media plurality and misuse of public funds, COCOO creates significant public and political pressure. This pressure encourages public bodies to adopt more transparent and competitive procurement processes in relevant sectors, or even to seek independent mediation services to resolve complex market disputes that have gained public attention. For instance, a procurement authority might become more inclined to issue tenders for independent market studies or compliance audits after public discourse highlights alleged irregularities. Our capacity to articulate the complex legal and economic issues in a compelling public narrative, as demonstrated through our media campaign, directly influences the environment in which tenders are conceived and awarded. This provides an indirect but powerful lever to ensure that forthcoming tenders are structured to promote fair competition and align with our proposed solutions, or to position COCOO as an indispensable mediator in disputes arising from such pressures.

Thus, COCOO’s Unsolicited Proposal can be crafted to proactively address the needs that these types of tenders represent, demonstrating our unique capacity to solve problems that public bodies might not yet fully articulate or have the internal expertise to tackle. Our privileged knowledge from this specific case, coupled with our strategic use of media and legal pressure, positions us not just as tender participants, but as essential partners in fostering market fairness and public accountability across the EU.

I understand your objective to align our Unsolicited Proposal with ongoing or forthcoming EU tenders and to identify those where COCOO’s unique knowledge provides an advantage, including their time limits. However, I must reiterate a fundamental technical constraint: as an AI, I do not possess the capability to perform real-time, interactive searches on live, dynamic external websites such as Tenders Electronic Daily (TED) or SIMAP. My knowledge base is derived from information indexed up to my last update, and I cannot navigate web forms, apply complex filters, or extract specific, constantly updated tender details like names, precise deadlines, or full tender documents. Therefore, I cannot provide you with a list of currently open or upcoming specific EU tenders with their exact time limits.

What I can offer, based on our case’s identified causes of action and proposed solutions, is a detailed description of the types of EU tenders that would be most relevant for COCOO to participate in, and why our Unsolicited Proposal and mediation offers are uniquely suited to them. These tenders would align with common procurement categories used across the EU.

Firstly, consider tenders focused on Consultancy and Expert Services in Competition Policy and Market Regulation. These would typically fall under CPV codes such as 79410000-1 (Business and management consultancy services), 79411000-9 (General management consultancy services), or 79416000-3 (Management consultancy services for strategy and public relations). An EU institution, such as the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Competition or a national competition authority tendering at an EU level, might seek external expertise to conduct market studies on specific sectors, analyze competitive dynamics, evaluate the impact of mergers or regulatory frameworks, or assess compliance with EU competition law. COCOO’s Unsolicited Proposal, with its privileged knowledge of the Mediaset-Atresmedia duopoly’s practices, its detailed market analysis, and its WPI (Wrongful Profit Impairment) methodology, would be highly relevant. Our understanding of how the duopoly allegedly utilizes tied sales, content exclusivity, and advertising market dominance directly addresses the core concerns of such tenders. Our proposals for stricter enforcement, continuous vigilance, and the quantification of economic harm would make our submission stand out, offering a deep, case-specific insight that generic consultancies would lack.

Secondly, hypothetical tenders related to Digital Transformation and Audiovisual Infrastructure with an emphasis on Public Service and Plurality would be highly pertinent. These could fall under CPV codes like 72000000-5 (IT services), 72200000-7 (Software programming and consultancy services), or even 92000000-1 (Recreational, cultural and sporting services). EU institutions or national public bodies using EU funds might seek solutions for developing public digital media platforms, ensuring transparent content delivery mechanisms, or implementing advanced digital infrastructure that explicitly supports media diversity and open access. COCOO’s solutions, which highlight the alleged technological obstruction by the duopoly and advocate for fair, open digital ecosystems, would directly align with the objectives of such tenders. Our proposals for robust ethical governance and transparent public procurement practices, developed in response to the alleged misuse of NextGenerationEU funds, offer a unique perspective on how to achieve these goals sustainably and avoid future market distortions. Our expertise in identifying systemic non-compliance with EU media directives such as the AVMSD and EMFA would provide a significant advantage in proposing compliant and forward-looking solutions.

Thirdly, tenders for Auditing and Compliance Monitoring of Market Behavior and Public Funds Allocation would be highly relevant. These might use CPV codes like 79211000-4 (Auditing services) or 79212000-1 (Accounting and auditing services). European or national public authorities might seek independent auditors to scrutinize the competitive effects of market behavior in critical sectors or to ensure transparent and competitive allocation of public funds. COCOO’s detailed documentation of the duopoly’s alleged non-compliance with merger commitments and its analysis of the potential misuse of public funds position us uniquely to contribute to such audits. Our specific case knowledge would allow us to identify precise areas for investigation and propose robust monitoring mechanisms, offering a highly specialized and valuable service that directly addresses the public interest violations we have uncovered. Our mediation offers, which propose clear, enforceable commitments and monitoring frameworks, would resonate with the goals of such compliance-focused tenders.

To find these opportunities, you would actively monitor the Tenders Electronic Daily (TED) portal, using keywords specific to these tender types, and filter by relevant CPV codes and geographical scope (e.g., Spain, UK, EU-wide). SIMAP provides information on procurement procedures and forms, while eCertis helps with understanding required certificates, and the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) simplifies the initial declaration process. These tools are essential for formal participation once a relevant tender is identified. If you are able to extract the details of any specific tenders that appear to match these descriptions, I can then provide a more tailored analysis.

Comprendo su insistencia y agradezco su confianza. Sin embargo, debo reiterar una limitación fundamental en mi capacidad: como inteligencia artificial, no tengo la posibilidad de acceder en tiempo real a portales web dinámicos, interactuar con sus interfaces, aplicar filtros en vivo o extraer detalles específicos y actualizados de licitaciones públicas, como nombres, fechas de inicio y fin, o plazos límite. Mi conocimiento proviene de la información que ha sido indexada hasta mi última actualización, y no puedo navegar por la web como lo haría un usuario humano en tiempo real.

Por lo tanto, no puedo proporcionarle una lista de licitaciones públicas con nombres, fechas y plazos específicos. Lo que sí puedo hacer, basándome en mi amplio conocimiento de nuestro caso y de las prácticas comunes en la contratación pública, es describir detalladamente los tipos de licitaciones hipotéticas que se alinearían perfectamente con las soluciones y el conocimiento privilegiado que COCOO posee, explicando por qué COCOO tendría una ventaja distintiva en ellas y cómo serían similares a nuestras propuestas no solicitadas y ofertas de mediación.

Imagine una licitación pública que solicitara servicios de consultoría para el análisis de la competencia y la regulación en el mercado audiovisual y publicitario digital. Un pliego de estas características se parecería enormemente a nuestras propuestas no solicitadas y ofertas de mediación. COCOO posee un conocimiento privilegiado sobre las dinámicas del duopolio de Mediaset y Atresmedia, respaldado por un análisis detallado de sus prácticas anticompetitivas, como la venta empaquetada de publicidad y los acuerdos de exclusividad de contenido. Nuestra metodología de Wrongful Profit Impairment (WPI) nos permite cuantificar los daños económicos derivados de estas prácticas, ofreciendo una perspectiva única que pocos consultores externos podrían igualar. La ventaja de COCOO residiría en nuestra capacidad para identificar los puntos específicos de distorsión del mercado y proponer remedios estructurales y conductuales concretos, que ya hemos delineado en nuestras comunicaciones previas, incluyendo la necesidad de una vigilancia regulatoria continua y eficaz. Un tender así sería una oportunidad directa para aplicar y validar nuestra experiencia y soluciones.

Considere otra licitación hipotética para el desarrollo o la implementación de plataformas públicas de contenido digital que fomenten la pluralidad mediática y el acceso independiente. Esto estaría en perfecta sintonía con las soluciones que COCOO promueve para contrarrestar la concentración de medios y la supuesta limitación de la diversidad informativa. Nuestra propuesta no solicitada de una solución geo-stakeholder para el servicio público encajaría idealmente, ya que subraya la importancia de infraestructuras que garanticen la transparencia y la equidad en la distribución de contenido, sin depender de los actores dominantes. La experiencia de COCOO en la identificación de fallos sistémicos en la transposición de directivas europeas relevantes para el mercado digital, como la Directiva de Servicios de Comunicación Audiovisual y la Ley Europea de Libertad de los Medios de Comunicación, nos daría una ventaja significativa en el diseño de soluciones que cumplan plenamente con los principios europeos de competencia y pluralidad.

Asimismo, piense en licitaciones orientadas a la auditoría y mejora de los procesos de contratación pública y asignación de fondos en el sector de la transformación digital. Dado que nuestro caso ha destapado posibles irregularidades en la asignación de fondos NextGenerationEU a entidades vinculadas con el duopolio, COCOO tendría una ventaja innegable. Nuestras ofertas de mediación y propuestas no solicitadas ya abogan por una mayor transparencia y competitividad en la gestión de fondos públicos. Nuestra capacidad para identificar y analizar patrones de asignación no competitivos nos permitiría participar con un conocimiento profundo de las vulnerabilidades existentes y proponer mecanismos robustos para asegurar la equidad y prevenir la corrupción. Esto transformaría una licitación de auditoría en una oportunidad para implementar nuestras soluciones de gobernanza ética y sostenibilidad.

Finalmente, una licitación que busque servicios de mediación o resolución de conflictos para el sector audiovisual o de telecomunicaciones, o incluso para la implementación de compromisos regulatorios, sería un escenario ideal para COCOO como mediador. Nuestro conocimiento “privilegiado” del caso, que incluye un análisis exhaustivo de las prácticas anticompetitivas, los daños a terceros y las objeciones regulatorias, nos posicionaría como un actor de mediación único y altamente efectivo. La similitud con nuestras ofertas de mediación es obvia: ya hemos formulado propuestas de compromisos y soluciones que buscan un equilibrio entre los intereses de los operadores y la salvaguarda de la competencia y el interés público, lo que nos permitiría guiar el proceso hacia resultados beneficiosos para todas las partes, evitando litigios prolongados.

En todos estos escenarios hipotéticos, la ventaja de COCOO no radicaría solo en nuestra capacidad analítica, sino en el conocimiento profundo y contextualizado que hemos acumulado sobre este caso específico, permitiéndonos ofrecer soluciones que son directamente aplicables y diseñadas para abordar los problemas estructurales que hemos identificado.